jump to navigation

Housing News: November 2, 2009 November 2, 2009

Posted by John Watch in AccuriZ News, AccuriZ Reports, News Feed.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment










Housing News: October 29, 2009 October 29, 2009

Posted by John Watch in AccuriZ News, AccuriZ Reports, News Feed.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

The ups and downs of the real estate market…always keeps us in suspense..please read on…








Housing News: October 28, 2009 October 28, 2009

Posted by John Watch in AccuriZ News, AccuriZ Reports, News Feed.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment
We take a “closer” look on real estate and mortgage news!


Housing News: October 27, 2009 October 27, 2009

Posted by John Watch in AccuriZ News, AccuriZ Reports, News Feed.
Tags: , ,
add a comment











Live Help Feature Activated on AccuriZ! September 30, 2009

Posted by John Watch in AccuriZ News.
Tags: ,
add a comment

To better service our customers, we have implemented a ‘Live Help’ feature on the front page of the company website. Located in the top, right corner next to Login and Enroll, you can interact with us instantly. It’s easier than phone calls and speedier than e-mailing. Have any questions? Looking for a property? Need a statistical report or property data? Searching for public records? Problems with enrolling? Let us know through Live Help now so we can assist you!

Summer Breather: Positive News leads to Increased Confidence! September 10, 2009

Posted by John Watch in AccuriZ News.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

White pants and white shoes go in the closet after Labor Day!

And so should the commentary we have become addicted to over the last six months regarding the Real Estate Market.  The rhetoric of “worse is to come” claiming the headlines should be replaced with the optimism of a full fledged recovery in 2010.

I have presented several blog posts during the past eight weeks dealing with Housing in Crisis, Mortgage Assistance Programs and most notably the Cyclical and Seasonal real estate markets.  Our efforts to attain over 40 million public records covering the top 100 MSA’s has been successful, yielding positive results that analyze actual property data and sales activity, not a tracking index.

Because real estate is complex, many analysts seek a simple solution to explain the patterns of buying and selling activity. But there is no simple solution; given that location and square footage are two critical elements that affect property values.

We have received over 100 comments to our blogs which tend to agree with this.  So my challenge to those who follow our posts is to join in and become more Active!  Your comments do not just reach us; they reach other members who can benefit from your insight and guidance.

Opinions on the real estate market will only change when more analyses of public records and the property data associated with those records are presented and accepted by the blogosphere.  This is not a small block of users that can be ignored.

Sure, there remain problems in the market. Sure, appraisers are being conservative. And yes, some agents may be crossing the line.  But the bottom line is this:

Positive News leads to increased confidence.  Increased confidence will lead to more sales and thus all Real Estate Agents benefit. We are headed towards a housing recovery and we need to announce it.  So submit a blog post or comment where you have experienced something positive in the past three months or what you see ahead.

You can make a difference!

Bookmark and Share

Don’t Wait Until 2010. Be Proactive! September 10, 2009

Posted by John Watch in News Feed.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

After reading Martha Brown’s Active Rain Post about Waiting, I realized that many of us in Real Estate are subject to this habit. We wait for property data reports and public records, wait for a popular opinion or wait to see if things will get better. And while sometimes, waiting is the best thing to do, having a reactive mindset isn’t. Being reactive is waiting for things to happen before we decide to do something about it – in other words- NOT PLANNING. With that said, why wait?

Real Estate is Cyclical, Seasonal and Emotional, and unfortunately we have seen all three in 2009. Instead of waiting until the turn of the 2009 clock, set goals, checks and balances now to ensure your secuirty in the real estate market. As time passes and the market corrects itself, foreclosures will ease, more people will get loan assistance and prices will go up. How will this affect you?

An important factor in the housing bust was borrowers not being prepared for changes in values in the market. Instead of being proactive, most people were left with nowhere to turn after the crisis was already here. Now, borrowers with “exotic mortgages” are reaching the limit to pay up. Being proactive and not waiting for things to happen are the keys to a better outlook. We are the ones in control, and we have to start acting like it. AccuriZ is looking forward as we move in the Real Estate Market.

So BE PROACTIVE. 2010 is right around the corner. What does it hold in store for you?

Bookmark and Share

Mortgage Assistance Program for Homeowners September 8, 2009

Posted by John Watch in AccuriZ News, News Feed.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

With the latest news from public records on the government controlling 86% of all new home loans, we’ll re-visit our Mortgage Assistance Program created months ago to prevent foreclosure. There is worry that a significant amount of these new home loans guaranteed by FHA will default, causing a second decline in the housing market. With a minimum 3.5% down on these loans, the assisting $8,000 tax-credit provides new homeowners a cushion to purchase. But as the expiration date on this tax-credit approaches, the market is leery on the aftermath of its removal.  The plan that we have presented has a reduced mortgage payment for a time period (covered by the government) until the borrower can afford to pay more. This short-term assistance would be beneficial to homeowners soon to default. Here is an excerpt from the plan:

Under President Obama’s new approach, property owners should not be removed from a home, but permitted to stay and pay rent.  If someone can pay rent, than that same person can pay a mortgage payment if structured correctly.  The government is providing $8,000 for first time buyers, so why can’t the government pay part of the payment and have the borrower repay the government in the future??

Instead of a rental payment, let the homeowner make the payment toward the mortgage and the government can cover the difference in a mortgage assistance program which will be repaid over time. Here is an example of how it could work.

• Mr. and Mrs. Z have a mortgage payment of $1,170 ($200,000 loan with 30 year payout at 5.75% interest).

• The Z’s lose their job and can only pay $470, so the government pays the difference of $700

• The Z’s remain homeowners and work through their problem. It takes the Z’s 10 months to get back on their feet, the government paid out $7,000 and now the Z’s owe the government.

• But the government says okay, you can start paying us back in seven years and the payment will be over 10 years at an interest rate of 3%.

What the government provides is assistance to the property owner (just like the bailout plans for the Financial Industry and Automotive Industry) and requires them to pay back the obligation starting in seven years. This is not a freebie, but short term assistance. Franklin Roosevelt called it Lend Lease.

See the benefits, implementation and the obstacles of the program HERE:

Bookmark and Share

Manhattan Condo Market Projected to Stabilize: Glass is Half Full and Topping Off! August 12, 2009

Posted by John Watch in AccuriZ Reports, News Feed.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The Manhattan Condominium Market is about to “shock the skeptics”.  There have been numerous reports published by noted “Manhattan Experts”, but a recent article in Crain’s Business week begs of the question “Who is manipulating What and Why? (See the NYC Square Footage Report) (See our repsonse to the Crain’s Business Report)

Has a “Shadow” fallen on the NYC condo market, or is it just another game of smoke and mirrors?  We thank the New York City Department of Finance for enabling those who have the desire to do the actual analysis, assuming one has the ability to do so.  The Department of Finance has provided public records of a rolling sales history since 2003.  This represents all property sales in New York City;  not listings, not possible listings and not sales that didn’t close or the seller backed out.  But Real Sales data! 

DoF also provides public records to the Assessment Rolls for Class I, II, III and IV Properties.  From this Assessment Roll we can find out how many properties exist in each borough and when the property was built.  An individual with some basic computer skills can than run a query to append the sales file with the Assessment file.

Once completed, a further level of skill is required; not a lot of skill, but just a little.  Invalid sales should be stripped out of the analysis.  An invalid sale would be a property that transferred for less than $1,000 dollars.  As a seasoned valuation analyst, I would actually go an additional step and remove all sales that sold for under a $125 per square foot in Manhattan.  The simple fact is that such sales would not be representative of the market and do not come close to representing the actual cost of construction.

So common sense prevails.   In the end, a valid set of sales and property data is available for analysis. The table below indicates that the average and median sales price for condos is declining at a rate of about 8% for the first six months of 2009.  This is much lower than some reports have indicated, but HOLD ON.. there’s more.

Manhattan Condo Market 1

Source: AccuriZ.com

Manhattan Condo Market 2

Source: AccuriZ.com

The chart above considers the rolling average of sales from July 2008 to July 2009.  We have applied this property data to adjust for the over correction in the markets and the seasonal affect of winter sales.  Based on the trend line, we are projecting that for the months of July, August and September sales activity will increase and property values will adjust upward.  Furthermore, the 4th Quarter – which usually shows weaker activity and valuation – will indicate a level of stability.

In short, when you analyze data with a known common factor such as “Square Footage”, manipulation of the data is difficult.  Combine this with an open policy of NYC to provide data free for analysis when it used to cost over $20,000, analyst can now openly check one another.

There is a true check and balance and the latest reports about the Manhattan market are misleading.

Bookmark and Share

Bad Data, Bad Analysis, Inept Real Estate Broker and Misinformed Seller are All to Blame. August 11, 2009

Posted by John Watch in News Feed.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

The following commentary is in repsone to a recent Crain’s New York Business article titled “Shadow units cast pall” by Amanda Fung. The article discussed a glut of “shadow inventory” in New York City, particularly in Williamsbug and Manhattan. Sources claimed that Manhattan had more than 10,000 unsold condos. Based on my findings, the data and information being presented in the article proved to be misleading, if not out right false. Here is the response. Remember, real estate is three things: Cyclical, Seasonal and Emotional.


I had the opportunity to read your article regarding Shadow Inventory in the Crain’s Online Publication.  My initial reaction was there are always two sides to every story. But as I reviewed the data that was being quoted, I became concerned with some of the facts and data provided to you.  My focus of concern is the condominium market and discussions related to Shadow Inventory, and more importantly data provided by the real estate sources referenced. 

In the 25 years that I have been valuing and analyzing real estate, the term “Shadow Inventory” has never been presented before.  What I gather is that this is a buzz word used to discuss inventory that has been built, is under construction or just coming on the market.  This has never been called Shadow Inventory, but pending inventory

Because the property data being presented in the article contradicts reports I have prepared and published, I started to review the information by outside sources that was provided to you in more detail.  The 18 month supply issue baffles me because I simply cannot determine where this comes from.  Also, the “glut” of Williamsburg has me confused.  Analysis of construction activity, public records and sales activity clearly indicate that Manhattan alone absorbs about 9,000 new condo units a year.  For 2009, sales activity and public records indicate an annualized absorption of about 6,000 units.  This would be 3,000 off the peak, so again how does 3,000 fewer units sales compute to 10,000 unsold units.  Also, the 7,000 plus units coming on line in 2010 will be absorbed into the market based on Historical Sales and building Activity.

Yes, there has been a decline in sales activity since the peak of 2007, but new construction has not exceeded demand in population growth and affordable housing.  The key word is affordable.  The fact that a developer lists a property too high relative to the market does not indicate a collapse, but a misinformed seller.

Your article is an amazing coincidence for me, because hours before I read it, I completed an in-depth analysis of Williamsburg/Greenpoint condo market for a client.  What I discovered was not a “glut” of housing, but incorrectly priced housing.  My clients project was listed by a real estate agent with unit values $100,000 above the market and incorrectly stated square footage.  My firm has been arguing this point for years, it is all about the property data.  Based on the recommendations provided, the client relisted the units at the prevailing price per square foot rate for walk-up condo units of $550 psf.  He has already received four inquiries, with one being a serious buyer.  He did not receive a single call on the building in the past three months.  My analysis does not indicate that this community is in a “bust stage”. 

Bad data, bad analysis, inept Real Estate Broker and misinformed seller are all to blame.  What is most disturbing is bad data and bad analysis. 

The following is a summary of my analysis that was provided to the client:

Since 2000, the following construction activity has occurred in the City based on the 2009/10 New York City Department of Finance Records:

Single Family Homes       9,012 new units

Two Family                         25,974 new units

Three Family                      6,157 new units

Tax Class I condos            719 new units

Tax Class II condos           26,699 new units

“454 sales have occurred in Williamsburg/Greenpoint market in the past year.  There are 192 sales classified as walk-up condominium projects with an average sppsf of $570.86 and Median of $569.17.  Given the location of your property, I recommend listing at $550 psf for 1 Bedroom Units and be prepared to accept 10% less.  Development around your complex will draw buyers, but there is a correlation to subway proximity and value.  Hence the 10% lower acceptance.  The number of new units coming on the market is meeting the demand of residents from the Lower Eastside, notably NYU students who cannot afford to rent or buy in Manhattan.  Over the past 10 years, NYU has acquired many housing units south of 23rd which has driven up housing costs.  After 9/11 Williamsburg/Greenpoint experienced a revitalization effort that has brought a new wave of construction and demand for the area.  Current market conditions mean that you have to price correctly, the prior listings could have potentially hurt your efforts, creating a distress situation perception in the market.”

Amanda, some questions about the data provided to you!

According to your article, Jonathan Miller states that there are 10,445 unsold condo units in Manhattan, plus another 7,000 coming on-line.  He calls these shadow units.  According to the New York City Department of Finance, for Manhattan there are:

Class I Condos:                  198  total units

Class II Condos:                 100,173 total units

Public records show a total of 26,699 units were constructed since 2000.  This represents over 25% of all condominium units.  Mr. Miller is stating that 10% of all condos are vacant or unsold?  And by unsold, does that mean there is a current owner who wants to sell or can’t sell?

Based on Mr. Millers comments, 10% of all condo’s are on the market in Manhattan, with another 7% coming on.  This just does not factor correctly and here is why:

Since 2003 there has been no more than 10,000 valid sale transfers per year of condominium units in Manhattan. (See table below).  Mr. Miller states that there are 10,445 unsold units in inventory which appears to be a normalized number, so what is the point.  This isn’t of much significance given the history of sales for condominium units.  As a matter of fact, all units constructed since 2000 have been absorbed into the market within a very finite time (less than 6 months).  Following is more information to support our data points:

Since August of 2008 there have been 10,076 condo sales in Manhattan.  This represents 10% of all properties.  When only usable sales are considered, (indicated square footage over 200, valid sale price over $10,000), the number is reduced to 5,407 sales or 5.4% of all condo properties with an indicated Average Sales Price of $1,805,328 and Median of $1,089,527.  The variance is rather significant.  Analysis of 2009 Sales Only shows 1,764 valid sales with a Average sale price of $1,656,783 and Median of $1,025,000.  Perhaps the use of the Average and Median Sale price is confusing some, because the Sale Price Per Square Foot provides a totally different view of the market.

Average Sales Price Per Square Foot      

  • $1,229 (7/2008 to 7/20009)          
  • $1,180 (’09 Only)

Median Sales Price Per Square Foot       

  • $1,145 (7/2008 to 7/2009)          
  • $1,070 (’09 Only)

Square Footage has a significant impact on the values, with less than a 7% variance between Mean and Median, and property values from 2008 to 2009 are only down 4%, not the 30% levels being reported by some.  And we cannot just rely on the Average and Median Sale Price alone.

Further Analysis by Sales per Year since 2003 indicates the following (Click To View)

Bad Data Big Text 174 

 Total Sales are all recorded instruments with the New York City Department of Finance and County Clerk (http://www.nyc.gov/html/dof/html/home/home.shtml )

Useable Sales are defined as sales greater than $10,000, greater than $100 per square foot and having a valid square footage greater than 200 feet (minimum required for living space).

Usable sales historically represent about 60% of all sales.  Since July of 2008, this figure has dropped to 54% and for all sales in 2009 it is at 46%.  2009 is projected to have the lowest useable sales on record since 2003.

CURRENT value indicators clearly show that on a rate per square foot basis the Manhattan Condominium Market is off in value by less than 4%.  (all data used in this analysis is obtained from the NYC Department of Finance and is 100% verifiable).

You have quoted many individuals and their opinions in the article, but they appear to be lacking the data like the statistics being presented above.  It concerns me when I believe reporters receive information from sources that appear to have a hidden agenda.  The developments coming on line can easily be absorbed into the market. 

Again I will state, Bad data, bad analysis, inept Real Estate Broker and misinformed seller are all to blame for listing properties to high.  Analysis of actual data and using accepted and appropriate statistical analysis yields results that are explainable and defensible.  Quoting individuals without verification from noted and verifiable sources impinges the creditability of the article.

John Watch, President & CEO



Bookmark and Share